What is Natural? (1-10)
Why is a carrot natural and corn syrup not?
Essence is a pseudo-part, and object is a pseudo-whole. All is essence and all is partial in context of a greater whole or a different part. When an object is taken by its universal substance within it, we get a part of a part which makes us think of the object as a sort of whole, but it is a pseudo-whole. This pseudo-whole is the pseudo-natural object.
If to take an essence of a thing is to make something unnatural, then to digest food is unnatural, as we eat and our body extracts nutrients. Of course, in reality, it is a natural process to extract essences from objects, if anything at all is natural.
Despite the object (food) being a pseudo-natural and a pseudo-whole (the carrot-in-itself rather than carrot-as-food), it nonetheless becomes a pragmatic-natural and a pragmatic-whole, which both signals the falseness internal to the terms along with the technical qualities of the whole. The modern carrot has been bred by man to have particular qualities, but it is still considered a natural food.
Corn syrup immediately has the appearance of the hand of man, thus it is a pseudo-natural and not a whole object in itself. Also, one can not eat a corn syrup popsicle alone, it needs a greater whole, which also marks it as something which fails to appear as natural. In addition, in its essence, it has qualities which can harm peoples’ health, which also earns it the name of non-natural. Natural is a feeling or experience of wholeness or correctness which corn syrup can not provide, but a carrot can. Something is judged false when a pragmatic-natural whole object which guides the will of a speaker, but a nothingness or negative to the truth which is opposed to it appears. Nonetheless, a speaker determines a whole which is to not be analysed or extracted, and to be taken as a whole object in-itself.
The dream symbol is false insofar as it appears as one thing, but it might point to a second thing which it is not directly speaking. It is a condensation which takes the form of one concrete symbol, but means a second symbol. However, one can be a natural dream analyst by trying to not interpret anything symbolic, using symbolism to obscure the symbolism of the false non-symbol, to posit a whole in-itself of the dream.
Natural is the name of what is whole due to a lack of analysis. To call natural a pseudo-natural is unnatural because it is extracting the falsehood within the conceptual symbol of the natural.
Despite natural being a term which carries a falseness in its own Absolute conceptualization, a process of naturalizing and non-analysis is extraordinarily efficient in the same way that dreams are efficient at carrying information symbolically with immediate impact, closing off the space of its own interpretation in-itself.
To analyse a dream is the extract meaning from it in the same way the body extracts nutrients from food, but to close off space and move to a different moment also extracts meaning in a different way, unlike not eating food. A dream analysed or unanalysed still carries essential meaning, where as uneaten food does not carry the essential nutrient for someone looking at it.
No particular analysis is necessary to assert what is natural, only the cessation of analysis and the assertion of wholes. Any analysis does this when it essentializes meaning in one object to posit meaning in the words of its own analysis. Naturalization is a self-contradictory, inevitable, pragmatic process of positing whole objects.
Naturalization is a process of closing and assertion. To close and to a posit a whole is thus to align with nature by engaging in the process of naturalization. Analysis denaturalizes in order to naturalize again, and to condense into another whole. Essence serves to posit wholes, despite wholes not being Absolute wholes, but pragmatic-wholes and pseudo-natural objects.
